dashboard



Judge denies Sarah Palin's bid for new libel trial against New York Times

Judge denies Sarah Palin's bid for new libel trial against New York Times



'I've got nothing to lose': Sarah Palin speaks out about her run for CongressReplayMore Videos ... (16 Videos)'I've got nothing to lose': Sarah Palin speaks out about her run for CongressSports host Rich Eisen calls out Ted Cruz and Mike LeeWatch Ellen DeGeneres say goodbye to her show after 19 seasonsHear Jimmy Kimmel's tearful response to Texas shootingOprah Winfrey gets 'a little emotional' saying goodbye to 'The Ellen DeGeneres Show'Watch Kellyanne Conway's contentious appearance on 'The View'Watch John Mulaney and Andy Samberg roast Jimmy Kimmel for getting Covid againTucker Carlson now says he doesn't know about a conspiracy theory he's pushed in 400 segmentsWatch Fox host react to Buffalo shooting'Millions of people absorb this garbage': Acosta calls out Carlson for dangerous rhetoricStelter: Shooting is 'replacement theory' rearing its ugly head again'Never say never': Melania Trump teases second term as First LadyElection causes divide among top Fox hostsRussian journalists explain why they defied PutinStelter: This is a shocking breach of the pro-Kremlin lineJournalist watched Russian state TV for 50 hours. Hear what surprised him (CNN Business)A judge has denied former vice-presidential nominee and Alaskan governor Sarah Palin's bid for a new trial in her defamation case against the New York Times, according to a written decision filed Tuesday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Palin sued the Times and its former editorial page editor James Bennet in 2017 after they published an editorial that erroneously linked a map that Palin's political action committee had posted to a shooting in 2011 that killed six and injured 13 others, including former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, CNN has reported. A jury found in February that Palin had not proven her case."Because Palin's instant motion is wholly lacking in merit, the Court denies it in full," said the opinion and order from Judge Jed Rakoff."Whatever she may have claimed in her complaint and pre-trial submissions, Palin was unable to deliver at trial admissible evidence that remotely supported her claim that she was intentionally or recklessly defamed by the defendants," the judge wrote in his opinion.Judge says Sarah Palin failed to prove her case against New York TimesIn 2017, the Times erroneously said that there was a "clear" link between a map that had crosshairs over congressional districts, including Giffords', and the shooting that injured her.Read MoreBennet testified that he added language about there being a clear link and that once he realized his error, he worked to quickly issue a correction. "In a defamation case brought by a public figure like Sarah Palin, a mistake is not enough to win if it was not motivated by actual malice," Rakoff wrote in his opinion. "And the striking thing about the trial here was that Palin, for all her earlier assertions, could not in the end introduce even a speck of such evidence." Times spokesman Charlie Stadtlander responded to the order, saying, "We are pleased to see the court's decision, and remain confident that the judge and jury decided the case fairly and correctly." CNN has reached out to attorneys for Palin, the Times and Bennet for comment.


Click Here To Get Funded!